We thank all of them for stepping forward, together, to carry the light of science and truth in a time of crisis to combat fear, uncertainty, and misinformation. Fukushima daiichi unit 1 accident progression uncertainty. Sandia report sand20126173 unlimited release printed august 2012 fukushima daiichi accident study status as of april 2012 randall gauntt, donald kalinich, jeff cardoni, jesse phillips, andrew goldmann. Analysis of the tepco fukushima daiichi nps accident. Fukushima nuclear accident an overview sciencedirect topics. Our case studies demonstrate how root cause analysis applies to a variety of problematic scenarios.
Fukushima accident, disaster that occurred in 2011 at the fukushima daiichi number one nuclear power plant on the pacific coast of northern japan, which was caused by a severe earthquake and powerful series of tsunami waves and was the second worst nuclear power accident in history. Fukushima daiichi accident world nuclear association. A read is counted each time someone views a publication summary such as the title, abstract, and list of authors, clicks on a figure, or views or downloads the fulltext. Risk assessment and decision analysis with bayesian networks. Pdf fukushima disaster is one of the most publicly exposed accidents in a nuclear facility which has changed the outlook of people towards nuclear. Explosion of the released hydrogen damaged three reactor buildings and impeded onsite. Introduction lessons learned from the fukushima nuclear. Pdf analysis of possible causes of fukushima disaster. An analysis of the amount of hydrogen taking part in the explosions that happened during the fukushima daiichi unit 1 nuclear power plant accident is presented herein. This case was selected because it illustrates communication around an. This summary is a brief overview of the full version of the fukushima nuclear accident analysis report hereinafter referred to as report edited to facilitate understanding of the full version.
How did media present the radiation risks after the fukushima accident. Critical analysis sara silva pinto wahnon under supervision of jose joaquim goncalves marques and carlos antonio abreu fonseca varandas instituto superior tecnico, lisbon, portugal september 20 abstract. A systemic approach to safety needs to be taken in event and accident analysis, considering all stakeholders and their interactions over time. This analysis does not represent the official position of the fda. Analysis by irsn of the fukushima daiichi accident of march. The investigation committee continued its multifaceted analysis, after the publication of the interim report, on matters including the thenavailable accident preventive measures and disaster. Analysis of core melt accident in fukushima daiichiunit 1 nuclear reactor fumiya tanabe sociotechnical systems safety research institute, 11404 ichige, hitachinakashi, ibaraki 3120033, japan received may, 2011 and accepted in revised form june 3, 2011 keywords. The fukushima nuclear accident and its implications for. Analysis by irsn of the fukushima daiichi accident of march 2011. The nra considers it important to technically analyze the nuclear accident of the fukushima daiichi nuclear power station continuously by using the analysis results of the accident, conducting mid and longterm investigation, and reflect necessary safety knowledge and information in the safety regulations.
Pumps that should have failed in a few hours ran for days, well beyond their expected design basis, says douglas osborn, a technical staff member in sandias severe accident analysis dept. Many human errors were made at fukushima, a point elaborated on in great detail in the interim report of the japanese governments investigation committee on the accident at the fukushima nuclear power stations, and our investigative commission has incorporated some of. The results of these activities have been put together in the reassessment of the fukushima nuclear accident and nuclear safety reform plan, which is a countermeasure based on this reassessment. After an accident a learning window opens where it is possible to ask questions that are usually not asked during non accident times. A detailed description of the functional couplings is beyond the scope of this paper, but the following should be sufficient to explain what this might mean in the case of the fukushima disaster. Nuclear accident in fukushima i nuclear power plant. Mar 08, 20 analysis by irsn of the fukushima daiichi accident of march 2011. Current research in nuclear reactor technology in brazil and worldwide, 20. The fukushima i nuclear accident shook the public trust on the nuclear industry and its future plans. Fukushima daiichi accident study status as of april 2012. Although the great east japan earthquake and the following tsunami triggered it, the key causes of the nuclear accident lie in the institutional failures of political influence. Five simulations were performed using different modeling approaches.
Fukushima unit 2 accident simulation with melcor 2. Analysis of who report on fukushima catastrophe dr. A provisional translation in english was published in february 2015. Case study of nuclear disaster fukushima nuclear power plant. In this sense, we believe the fukushima accident like its predecessorswas preventable. Radiation contour map as november 15, 2011 for fast interpretation and comparison of the results with the data found in the literature, the table 4 gives the conversion between commonly used units and its multiples for the measured dose equivalent rate, spanning all the relevant range of values for the fukushima accident. Today, risk analysis is applied in an increasing number of policy fields, including in security policy. Nuclear accident in fukushimai nuclear power plant. Fukushima daiichi unit 1 accident progression uncertainty analysis and implications for decommissioning of fukushima reactors volume i prepared by severe accident analysis department 06232 sandia national laboratories albuquerque, new mexico 87185 and livermore, california 94550. The fukushima daiichi nuclear power plant accident.
Approximately 80,000 residents within the restricted area the 20kilometer radius zone. Following the fukushima accident, the international commission on radiological protection icrp. Final report on the accident at fukushima nuclear power. Fukushima nuclear accident analysis report interim report. Analysis of core melt accident in fukushima daiichiunit1. Cancerrelated deaths as the consequence of the fukushima accident are estimated to be statistically insignificant. The fukushima nuclear accident and crisis management. The fukushima daiichi accident one report by the iaea director general five technical volumes the result of extensive international collaborative effort five working groups 180 experts 42 member states this report presents an assessment of the causes and consequences. Alex rosen university childrens clinic dusseldorf august 3rd 2012 on may 23rd, 2012, the world health organization who published what it called a preliminary dose. The following discussion on the root cause of the fukushima daiichi nuclear accident is based on the committee investigation report of the fukushima nuclear accident published by the atomic energy society of japan aesj, 2016. During the accident occurred at the fukushima daiichi nuclear power station in march 2011, three units of the nuclear power plants suffered extensive damage to the reactors and buildings. It has triggered a closer examination of specific site locations and designs associated with those sites.
This report would not have been possible without their hard work and dedication. To study a range of industries eat221, there are several levels of courses. The major dependencies are also shown in figure 1, using the principles of the fram functional resonance analysis method. The march 11, 2011, great east japan earthquake and tsunami sparked a humanitarian disaster in northeastern japan and initiated a severe nuclear accident at the fukushima daiichi nuclear plant. In april 2012 the us electric power research institute epri published fukushima daiichi accident technical causal factor analysis, which identified the root cause beyond the flooding and its effects as a failure to consider the possibility of the rupture of combinations of geological fault segments in the vicinity of the plant. The fukushima nuclear disaster caused by the earthquake on 11 march 2011 is a man.
Forward i would like to express my heartfelt sympathy to all of the people who were affected by the devastating earthquake on march 11 this year. In unit 1, loss of dc power for both motive force and instrumentation due to flooding substantially increased the difficulty of controlling the accident. Focus on chernobyl and fukushima journal of radiological. This focuses on a number of questions which remained unexplained in the 2012 national diet investigation commission report. An accident provides an opportunity to learn, not only for the organizations involved in the accident, but also for the other organizations within and outside the industry concerned. Final report on the accident at fukushima nuclear power stations of tokyo electric power company recommendations investigation committee. It is unfortunate that in addition to the designbasis tsunami 6 being too low, additional flood protection for the batteries was not provided. It is widely believed that all three reactor cores experienced some melting. Fukushima disaster is one of the most publicly exposed accidents in a nuclear facility which has changed the outlook of people towards nuclear power. Fukushima nuclear accident analysis report interim report december 02, 2011 the tokyo electric power company, inc.
The fukushima daiichi accident will be a subject of intense scrutiny and study for years to come. He later stated that this report would be an authoritative, factual and balanced assessment, addressing the causes and consequences of the. The fukushimadaichi nuclear power plant accident in march 2011 was the first occurrence showing that an extreme natural event, that generated stress levels far beyond nuclear power plant designbasis values, could lead to a core meltdown accident. The movement was so severe that the country moved a few metres east, the local coastline dropped, and it triggered a tsunami which killed thousands of people. Sandia report sand20126173 unlimited release printed august 2012 fukushima daiichi accident study status as of april 2012 randall gauntt, donald kalinich, jeff. Final report on the accident at fukushima nuclear power stations of tokyo electric power company recommendations investigation committee on the accident at fukushima nuclear power stations of tokyo electric power company july 23, 2012 on march 11, 2011, the fukushima daiichi nuclear power station fukushima daiichi nps. In october 2014 the nra published its analysis of the tepco fukushima daiichi nps accident, interim report. Analysis of the accident in the fukushima daiichi nuclear. Some have used it as an example to establish nuclear energy as an unsafe source, while others have. It is of the utmost importance to perform detailed analysis of the facts.
It resulted from an unlikely combination of natural disaster and human error, and threatened to pollute tokyo, the worlds largest urban center, with radiation. Ghezzi, walter cravero and nestor sanchez fornillo additional information is available at the end of the. The legacy of the fukushima nuclear disaster five years ago, on 11 march 2011, a large region of japan was shaken for three minutes by a magnitude 9. This nas study is being carried out on a longer 2year schedule and has a different scope. This assignment purpose is to do analysis case studies and the fukushima nuclear disaster. It was a failure of human institutions to acknowledge. Fukushima crisis, which the sasakawa peace foundation launched in july 2011. A comparative institutional analysis of the fukushima nuclear disaster. The report on the fukushima daiichi accident at the iaea general conference in september 2012, the director general announced that the iaea would prepare a report on the fukushima daiichi accident. Through a series of analytic approximations and numerical calculations of increasing complexity, it has been possible to estimate that kg of h 2 was involved in the. Fukushima nuclear disaster congressional research service 1 introduction and overview the disaster that struck japans fukushima daiichi nuclear power station on march 11, 2011, caused the most extensive release of radioactivity since the chernobyl accident in 1986 and was far worse than the 1979 three mile island accident in the united states.
Indepth analysis of the accident at fukushima on 11 march. Mar 05, 2018 a vtt fukushima daiichi unit 3 1f3 method for estimation of liquids and consequences of releases melcor model was modified to simulate the fukushima daiichi unit 2 1f2 accident. For the details, refer to the corresponding pages of the full version of the report as noted next to each topic heading. The purpose of this work is for students to use the appropriate method to verify each problem. Doug says that in the fukushima incident, the expected reactions that create hydrogen led to explosions in the units 1, 3, and 4 reactor buildings. The fukushima daiichi nuclear power plant disaster began with an earthquake north of tokyo on march 11, 2011.
Greenpeace international lessons from fukushima 5 greenpeace international lessons from fukushima it has been almost 12 months since the fukushima nuclear disaster began. Fission and activation product releases from the fukushima daiichi nuclear facility as remote indicators of source identification, extent of release, and state of damaged spent nuclear fuel. The model 1f2 v1 includes only the basic modifications to reproduce the 1f2 accident. It has also compelled nuclear safety experts to confirm that the principles upon which nuclear. Comparative analysis of the radionuclide composition in. Summary lessons learned from the fukushima nuclear accident. Catastrophes such as the fukushima disaster raise questions. A 2012 analysis of the intermediate and longlived radioactivity released found about 1020% of that released from the chernobyl disaster. Prior to fukushima, the chernobyl disaster was the only level 7 event on record, while the three mile island accident was rated as level 5. Three of the six reactors at the plant sustained severe core damage and released hydrogen and radioactive materials. Now three months into the disaster, the situation at fukushima remains very serious. An analysis of the hydrogen explosion in the fukushima. The accident at the fukushima daiichi nuclear power plant that resulted from the great east japan earthquake of march 11, 2011, involved the dispersion and spread of radioactive materials, and thus. Fission and activation product releases from the fukushima daiichi nuclear facility as remote indicators of source identification, extent of release, and state of damaged spent nuclear fuel jon m.
Summary lessons learned from the fukushima nuclear. Nuclear emergency response headquarters, additional report, ii415. Analysis by irsn of the fukushima daiichi accident of. Accident sequence for fukushima daiichi reactors grid power lost due to the earthquake plant experienced station blackout after emergency diesels were damaged by the tsunami nearly 1 hour later eventual loss of batteries and cooling to control steam driven. In this sense, we believe the fukushima accidentlike its predecessorswas preventable. Fukushima nuclear accident analysis report interim report plan. The official report of the fukushima nuclear accident independent. The analysis and comments regarding the communication efforts described in this case study are solely those of the authors.
1390 902 1342 1524 180 588 513 1474 356 1267 146 642 1133 686 996 1216 635 161 1564 1353 849 622 1175 892 273 1414 1450 416 1126 508 1078 826 1428 1433 976 535 223 696 1104 230 1140 627